Page 285 - CyberSecurityEssentialsEnglish

TABLE 6-22: A WORKED EXAMPLE, A CRITERIA-BASED DECISION ACTIVITY

Component The design

The learner chooses between two options but relies on
The learning problem
impression and states no consistent criterion.

The learning Compares two options against three criteria, justifies the
outcome decision, and states one limitation.

Prior knowledge Knows what a criterion means and has read the case data.

The first attempt Writes a provisional decision and two reasons in five minutes.

Plays a critical reviewer who asks for the criterion and the
The role of AI
evidence, and does not choose.

Approves the criteria and interprets the local context and
The human role
exceptions.

Attempt, then criteria, then AI questions, then revision, then a
The sequence
transfer case.

The evidence A comparison table with a justification and a stated limitation.

Against a rubric, with one priority comment and a chance to
Feedback
revise.

AI may be used for questions and alternatives, not to write the
Integrity
justification.

Accessibility A printable version, clear instructions, and an offline alternative.

Quality of justification, time taken, and amount of help
Evaluation
requested.

6.9.3 Testing the Activity Before You Run It
1. Carry out the activity yourself as a beginner, and note where the tool gives more help than

it should.
2. Test a correct case, an ambiguous case, and a case where the user tries to obtain the full

solution.
3. Review every fact, example, and criterion the tool will use inside the activity.
4. Ask another person to read the instructions with no spoken explanation, and record the
points of confusion.

5. Test the file or the link on a phone, with a screen reader where possible, and on a weak
connection.

284