Page 244 - CyberSecurityEssentialsEnglish
P. 244

Use AI in advising, communication, and student support with clear limits for escalation to a
         person.

         Formulate fair and clear rules for academic integrity, and redesign assessment to measure
         understanding, process, and performance.

         Apply the principles of universal design for learning and make content accessible to learners
         with different needs, languages, and backgrounds.
         Produce a complete AI-supported learning activity in the final practical lab.

         6.1 AI as an Assistant to Teaching and Learning, Not a Substitute
           ◆ Key idea: learning comes first.
           Education is not a process of producing texts or answers. It is an intended change in

           knowledge, skill, judgment, confidence, and the ability to apply. The role of AI is
           therefore chosen according to what supports that change, not according to what it can
           generate quickly.


         AI can play several roles inside the educational experience. It may act as a planner proposing
         an initial sequence for a lesson, an explainer re-presenting a concept in different language,
         a coach offering additional problems, a simulator embodying a dialogue or a situation, an
         assistant in building questions and rubrics, or a reflection partner helping a learner compare

         their attempts. The value does not come from the role alone, but from its timing, its limits,
         and the way it is tied to the learning outcome. This view is consistent with recommendations

         that  AI  in  education  should  support  teaching  and  learning  rather  than  replace  the
         pedagogical decision [4].

         A system has no complete knowledge of the student, the class, the culture, the tension, or
         the social relationships that surround learning. It may answer convincingly, but it does not

         see the look that signals confusion, it does not know that a particular example touches a
         sensitive experience, and it carries no responsibility for a pedagogical judgment or a decision
         affecting a learner’s future. The teacher remains responsible for the objective, the choice of

         content, the rhythm of learning, the building of trust, the interpretation of evidence, and the
         decision.

         Nor should the learner be reduced to a consumer of answers. Learning requires retrieval
         from memory, attempting, comparing, explaining, erring, correcting, and connecting ideas.

         If a tool removes every difficulty, it may remove with it the part that builds the skill. We
         therefore  distinguish  unproductive  load,  such  as  ambiguous  instructions  or  a  language

         barrier,  from  the  productive  effort  that  understanding  an  idea  and  solving  a  problem
         genuinely requires.






        243
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249