Page 182 - CyberSecurityEssentialsEnglish
P. 182
TABLE 4-14: DO NOT CONFUSE DETECTION, PROVENANCE, AUTHENTICATION, AND VERIFICATION
Concept What does it answer? Its limits
Detectors make mistakes, become
Does the content look
Detection outdated, and are not enough on their
generated or altered?
own for a high-impact decision.
When was the file created The absence of provenance data does
Provenance and edited, where not prove forgery, and its presence
documented data exists? does not prove the claim is true.
Is the source, the signature, The account may be compromised, or
Authentication
or the account trusted? the permission misused.
It requires independent sources,
Is the claim itself correct in
Verification context, dating, and an appropriate
context?
verification channel.
Reverse image search, examining the original footage, comparing audio against a trusted
source, and checking the date and place of publication are all useful tools. Avoid arbitrary
detection applications that ask you to upload sensitive content or that claim absolute
accuracy; detectors make mistakes and age as generation techniques change.
TABLE 4-15: A PROTOCOL FOR VERIFYING AN URGENT VOICE OR VIDEO MESSAGE
The question The action
Does it demand urgency, secrecy, or Stop the transfer or the sharing and do not
the bypassing of a procedure? respond to the pressure.
Can the identity be confirmed outside Call through a number or channel known in
the receiving medium? advance.
Does the action fit the pattern of work Verify the request with a second person or a
and the permissions? manager.
Return to the original version, its date, and its
Is the clip complete and in its context?
provenance data.
Is there a possibility of fraud, Preserve the message, the headers, and the
impersonation, or leakage? time, and notify the responsible team.
181

