Page 81 - CyberSecurityEssentialsEnglish
P. 81

Video: Creating Advanced Prompts

                                                      Examples of organizing context, using examples,
                                                      controlling the shape of the output, and improving

                                                      in stages instead of adding instructions at random.

                                                      Duration: about 25 minutes | Level: Intermediate
                                                      Learning objective: Structure a prompt so that its

                                                      output can be compared and reviewed.
                                                      Source: Microsoft [19].
                                                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAjzkaCdRok

                                                      Verified: June 6, 2026


         2.8 Iterative Refinement: Diagnose Before You Rewrite

           ◆ Key idea: change one factor and learn from the result.

           Do not rewrite the whole prompt after every output. Identify the largest defect:
           understanding of the task, missing material, format, tone, constraints, or accuracy. Adjust
           the factor that explains the defect, then compare the result against a clear case or
           criterion.


         The initial prompt is a hypothesis: “If I describe the task this way, the output will be suitable.”
         After seeing the result, it is not enough to say “I did not like it.” Identify where the gap lies.
         Was information used that does not exist? Is the audience wrong? Is the output too long?

         Are fields missing? Did an example cause unwanted imitation? Diagnosis turns refinement
         from taste into learning.

         Use a follow-up prompt to address a specific defect: “Reorganize the memo so that it begins
         with the decision, then the evidence, then the risks”, or “Keep the text and change only the

         tone.”  This  is  better  than  “improve  it”,  because  you  know  what  changed  and  you  can
         compare the two versions.

         For repeated tasks, create evaluation cases that represent reality rather than your best
         example. Run the prompt on five to ten cases: short and long, complete and incomplete,

         clear and borderline. Use a fixed acceptance list. A prompt may succeed on the case you
         designed it around and fail on others, which is a form of overfitting to a single example.

         If you change several elements at once, you may get a better result without knowing why.
         In simple personal use this matters little, but in an important template you should change
         one  factor  at  a  time  or  record  the  changes.  The  improvement  may  come  from  a  new

         example, the order of the material, the removal of a conflict, or even a change of model,
         rather than from the sentence you added at the end.






         80
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86