Page 234 - CyberSecurityEssentialsEnglish

3.Create the fact table: the claim or figure, its value, its source, the source date, and the
verification status.
4.Design the workflow: trigger, inputs, steps, the executor of each step, quality gates,

exceptions, and outputs.
5.Extract the material: use the tool to extract names, figures, and themes, then review a

sample and the critical fields.
6.Build the content map: the situation, the evidence, the options, the risks, and the decision
required.

7.Generate the draft: produce the summary, the tables, and the deck from a single map so
that the message stays consistent.
8.Specialist review: check the figures, the terminology, the assumptions, and the

commitments, and obtain the approval of the authorized owner.
9.Create the follow-up log: turn the decisions into tasks, owners, deadlines, and statuses.
10.Measure the round: record the cycle time, the review time, the number of revisions, and

the errors found.
11.Update the assets: save the prompt, the template, the checklist, and the final example
under a clear version.

TABLE 5-17: LAB OUTPUTS AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Output Acceptance criterion

One page, showing the situation, the options, and the decision
The executive summary
required.

The facts and sources table Every important figure and claim is linked to a source.

The options comparison Uniform criteria, with risks and assumptions made visible.

The short deck Five slides, each carrying a single finding.

The follow-up log A task, an owner, a deadline, and a status.

The workflow card Trigger, inputs, steps, gates, exceptions, and indicators.

The version record Version, date, owner, and changes.

◆ The final delivery gate
Before approving, ask: could someone who did not take part in preparing it trace the
source of the figures? Do they know what decision is required? Do the tables, the deck,

and the summary agree? Are the assumptions and the uncertainty visible? Is there an
owner for every next step?

233